Comparative Analysis of Legislative Reform of Admission by Apologetic Discourse

This study compares the protection of admission by apologetic discourse through legislative reform in selected Common Law jurisdictions. The provides a solution to long-standing problem adverse legal effects made professionals/practitioners who had breached their duty care, code ethics, or conducts. A similar is reported Malaysia due similarities evidentiary rules, insurance contract clauses and statutory limitation law attributed system. findings this comparative help towards development that protects for professional negligence misconduct Malaysia. Keywords: Apologetic discourse; admission; reform; eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2022. Authors. Published AMER ABRA cE-Bs e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. an open access article under CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review responsibility (Association Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), Behavioural Researchers on Asians) (Centre Studies), Faculty Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI7%20(Special%20Issue).3814